| BlueJayWayBlog - Terror
12/21/07 - "MAXINE & TED - DON'T CALL US IF YOU CALL US TERRORISTS!" (see this article by Linda Milazzo) 11/20/07 - "Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act Raises Fears of New Government Crackdown on Dissent." "Who Owns the Word Terror" (Adbusters for July/August) 6/24/06 - "Terrorism" is Phoney (First of all please see the 2005 - BBC documentary "The Power of Nightmares". This clearly documents the philosophical syncronicity of the NeoConservatives and the UltraRight Religious Zealots who they have contrived this conflict with, to manufacture a state of fear that justifies their Big Brother police state tactics.) The "terrorist threat" is a red herring that the Red&Blue Party is using as a diversionary shield to screen their real constituency's profit making activities of Corporate Empire. As the Red&Blue Party moves farther right. The Blues have to marginalize any lefty solutions that threaten their hold on power, namely the Greens. The Green Party Platform is a threat to the Democrats because it prescribes real solutions to all of our current problems. And these solutions are a threat because they don't feed the profits of greedy corporations. Green policies tame non-person behavior into acting as an aid to human co-habitation with earth, rather than it's inexhaustable consumpter. Just run the logic. If you were a "terrorist" and had a large "organized" group of participants in armed and illegal violence, that were on the same page, would you do the following activities that Al Queda [This term was invented by a paid criminal FBI informant after 911, and never used by anyone before then. It is now the term that is used by our defacto coup d'etat government to define a fictional enemy. Words with invented meanings like this are used as a form of social programming that is invoked, and even strengthened each time it is spoken. Fiction becomes reality. Illusion becomes truth. This is right out of the Big Brother 1984 playbook.] has done... ...broadcast your face, voice, cohorts, location, without any screening or illusions, to your superpowered enemy, with rhetoric that is completely unsympatheitic to anyone except someone within your murderous group? This is like Mickey Mouse shaking his fist at King Kong. ...If they really are so organized and dangerous why is our government unable to convict anyone of a serious crime in Guantanamo Bay? Or anywhere else for that matter? Why does our government have to employ torture? Maybe because when you can't find any real evidence used in a court of law, like is done in a real democracy, you need to forcibly coerce someone to say, anything, incriminating? Then the phoney state of amorphic fear is used to manipulate the public into accepting these immoral acts of desperation. How much of a coward is Rumsfeld and his minions? They are not smart enough to have valid investigations reveal actual evidence? In the great heirarchy of dangers present in the world where does "terrorism" stand? For one thing there's quite a bit of evidence that a valid 911 investigation needs to be reopened and that the 911 event was facilitated by NeoConservative Black Ops that have been seeded within our government over the last 30 years. If that's true the 2985 victims of Thrice Towers is a no-count. Each year in the US 440,000 people die from cigarette smoking and 42,000 are caused by car accidents. So why don't we torture people out of smoking cigarettes? Why don't we torture automobile executives until they design death free transportation vehicles? I would like to see a bar chart of death, injury and economic loss, for the top hazard types lined up against the results of "terrorism", and see what shows up as valid threats to society. We have been duped. Protest daily. Vote out all of the Red&Blue bums! Non-violent revolution now! Time for a Tea Party! |
